Indian Journal Watch: 6 November 2026

Indian Journal Watch, InfectionIndia.com

Indian Journal Watch

6 November 2026

Peer-reviewed microbiology, infectious disease, AMR and infection-control papers from India and South Asia, published or added to PubMed from 4 to 5 November 2026.

Lead articles

Environmental surveillance · Polio, typhoid & AMR · BMC Infectious Diseases

Environmental surveillance for Sabin polioviruses, Salmonella, and antimicrobial resistance genes in an urban setting in southern India

BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-026-14114-8 · PubMed 42983309

What
A study from the Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, evaluating simultaneous environmental detection of Sabin polioviruses, Salmonella Typhi and antimicrobial-resistance (AMR) genes in urban sewage, drinking water and food, comparing the Bag Mediated Filtration System (BMFS) with the WHO 2-phase method.
Design
Sewage from the 10-12 main channels in Vellore was collected by BMFS and the WHO 2-phase method for Sabin polioviruses 1 and 3 (February-July 2018; extended BMFS sampling until February 2020). Real-time PCR detected Sabin polioviruses, S. Typhi and other Salmonella; four multiplex conventional PCRs screened for AMR genes. Public and hospital sewage, community drinking water and food were also tested.
Key findings
Of 138 paired sewage samples, 13.8% (19/138) were Sabin-positive by BMFS versus 8.7% (12/138) by the WHO 2-phase method (p = 0.18). Among 342 BMFS sewage samples, S. Typhi was detected in 14.6% (50/342) by singleplex and 8.1% (22/270) by multiplex qPCR; hospital sewage positivity was 16.3% (43/264) and 12.8% (23/180) respectively. S. Typhi was found in 1.6% (2/124) of drinking-water samples and not in food. Of 210 community sewage samples tested for AMR, more than 90% were positive for CTX-M1, VIM, KPC and qnrS.
Limitations
The abstract reports that the BMFS-WHO difference for Sabin detection was not statistically significant; sampling was limited to one urban setting.
Relevance to India
The work supports amalgamating polio environmental surveillance with S. Typhi and AMR-gene monitoring in Indian cities as a multi-target public-health platform.

Mycology · Fungal keratitis · Current Medical Mycology

Clinical, mycological, and antifungal susceptibility testing of causative agents of fungal keratitis from North India

Current Medical Mycology · doi:10.22034/cmm.2025.345456.1692 · PubMed 42984741

What
A four-year laboratory and clinical series from the Advanced Eye Centre, PGIMER, Chandigarh, describing the aetiological spectrum, clinical associations and antifungal susceptibility of fungal keratitis (FK) in North India.
Design
Suspected FK cases from January 2020 to December 2023 were assessed by KOH microscopy and culture on Sabouraud dextrose agar. Preserved isolates underwent CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution against voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, luliconazole, miconazole, ketoconazole, amphotericin B, natamycin and terbinafine.
Key findings
Of 2,891 suspected cases, 677 were positive by microscopy or culture; 470 were culture-positive. Punjab accounted for 39.29% of cases, followed by Haryana (26.14%), Uttar Pradesh (14.33%) and Himachal Pradesh (14.03%). Aspergillus spp. comprised 42.12% (198/470) of culture-positive isolates, Fusarium spp. 36.80% (173/470) and dematiaceous fungi 15.10% (71/470). Vegetative trauma was the leading associated factor. Median MIC of voriconazole was 0.25 µg/ml for Aspergillus spp. and 0.5 µg/ml for Fusarium spp. and dematiaceous fungi.
Limitations
The series is from a single tertiary centre; the abstract does not report clinical outcomes by regimen.
Relevance to India
FK remains an important cause of monocular blindness in agrarian North India; the spectrum and MIC data inform local empirical antifungal choices pending culture.

More from the journals

Tuberculosis & mycobacteria

AMR, IPC & healthcare-associated infection

Vector-borne & parasitic diseases

Virology

Mycology

Outbreaks & public health

Other

Items are summaries of published abstracts and are not clinical advice. Readers should consult the original article. Figures are quoted as reported in each abstract.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *