Indian Journal Watch: 9 November 2026

Indian Journal Watch, InfectionIndia.com

Indian Journal Watch

9 November 2026

Microbiology, infectious disease, AMR and infection-control papers from India and South Asia added to PubMed on 7 to 8 November 2026 and not covered in earlier issues (PubMed showed no new qualifying entries dated 9 November at the time of compilation).

Lead articles

Surgical prophylaxis · Antimicrobial stewardship · EClinicalMedicine

Single-dose/day versus extended antibiotic prophylaxis for elective urological surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104303 · PubMed 42997755

What
A randomised controlled trial from the Department of Urology, AIIMS New Delhi, testing whether extending antibiotic prophylaxis beyond the immediate perioperative period gives additional protection against postoperative symptomatic urinary tract infection (sUTI) after elective urological surgery.
Design
Open-label trial of patients scheduled for elective urological surgery from March 2024 to September 2025, randomised 1:1 to single-dose or extended perioperative prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was sUTI within 30 days of surgery; secondary endpoints included one-week sUTI rate, asymptomatic bacteriuria at 7 and 30 days, 30-day readmission, antibiotic escalation, length of stay and subgroup analyses. Registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2024/03/063953).
Key findings
A total of 334 patients completed follow-up (single-dose group: n = 169; extended-prophylaxis group: n = 165). The 30-day sUTI rate was 7.1% (12/169) in the single-dose group versus 5.5% (9/165) in the extended-prophylaxis group (absolute risk difference 1.6%, 95% CI: -3.6% to 6.8%; p = 0.536). All secondary outcome parameters were comparable between the groups. No patient in either group developed septic shock or infection-related mortality.
Limitations
Single-centre, open-label design; the authors state the analysis was a test of difference and does not imply equivalence or non-inferiority.
Relevance to India
Prolonged perioperative prophylaxis is described by the authors as common practice driven by ingrained protocols; the trial adds Indian randomised data to stewardship discussions on surgical prophylaxis duration.

IPC · Hand hygiene · Infection Prevention in Practice

Implementation uptake and healthcare worker adherence following a World Health Organization-aligned multi-modal infection prevention and control intervention in Bangladeshi tertiary hospitals: a multi-centre comparative study

Infection Prevention in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100609 · PubMed 42999594

What
An icddr,b-led evaluation of ward-level implementation uptake and healthcare worker (HCW) adherence after a World Health Organization (WHO)-aligned multi-modal infection prevention and control (IPC) intervention in Bangladeshi tertiary hospitals.
Design
Post-intervention comparative study across six tertiary hospitals. Intervention wards received a multi-modal IPC package; non-intervention wards continued routine practice. Uptake was assessed through ward audits, supply checks and administrative records; HCW adherence (n = 1426) was measured by questionnaire and verified by direct observation of key IPC practices.
Key findings
IPC adherence scores were significantly higher in intervention wards (70.8% vs 59.4%; mean difference = 11.4 percentage points, 95% CI = 9.3-13.5; P < 0.001). Intervention wards showed greater availability of alcohol-based hand rub (90.9% vs 29.4%), supervision (90.9% vs 64.7%) and administrative engagement (95.5% vs 11.8%). Observed hand hygiene compliance was 35.8% vs 16.4%, substantially lower than self-reported rates in both groups. Working in an intervention ward was independently associated with an 11.85-point increase in IPC adherence (95% CI = 9.71-13.99; P < 0.001).
Limitations
Post-intervention design without a baseline comparison; the gap between reported and observed hand hygiene indicates self-report overstates practice.
Relevance to India and South Asia
The authors present bundled IPC implementation as feasible in resource-constrained settings and highlight the need for objective monitoring in IPC evaluation, relevant to hospital IPC programmes across the region.

More from the journals

AMR & antimicrobial discovery

TB, virology & vaccines

Vector-borne, parasitic & zoonotic

Clinical infection & mycology

Items are summaries of published abstracts and are not clinical advice. Readers should consult the original article. Figures are quoted as reported in each abstract.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *