Indian Journal Watch: 3 November 2026

Indian Journal Watch, InfectionIndia.com

Indian Journal Watch

3 November 2026

Peer-reviewed microbiology, infectious disease, AMR and infection-control papers from India and South Asia, published or added to PubMed from 1 to 2 November 2026.

Lead articles

Antimicrobial resistance & stewardship · IPC & healthcare-associated infection · Lung India

Seven versus 14 days of polymyxin-based therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii : A randomised feasibility trial

Lung India · doi:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_293_26 · PubMed 42969594

What
A randomised feasibility trial from the Departments of Medical Microbiology and Pulmonary Medicine, PGIMER Chandigarh, with AIIMS Nagpur, comparing 7-day versus 14-day polymyxin-based therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB).
Design
Single-centre, open-label trial in a tertiary-care respiratory ICU from March 2017 to October 2024. Patients with microbiologically confirmed CRAB-VAP who met predefined clinical stability criteria on day 7 were randomised 1:1 to stop antibiotics on day 7 or continue for 14 days. Treatment comprised intravenous colistin or polymyxin B with adjunctive nebulised colistin. The primary outcome was relapse of CRAB-VAP.
Key findings
41 patients were randomised (7-day n = 22; 14-day n = 19). Relapse occurred in 1 (4.5%) versus 2 (10.5%) patients (risk ratio [RR] 0.43; 95% CI: 0.04, 4.31). The 7-day group had more antibiotic-free days (mean difference: 6.9 days; 95% CI: 5.1, 8.7 days). Acute kidney injury occurred in 0% versus 31.6% (RR 0.07; 95% CI: 0.004, 1.15). 28-day mortality was 45.5 vs 63.2% (RR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.40, 1.30).
Limitations
Small, single-centre, open-label feasibility design; the authors state that clinical outcome estimates, including relapse and mortality, were imprecise and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.
Relevance to India
The authors conclude that a 7-day discontinuation strategy was feasible in clinically improving CRAB-VAP and that the findings support evaluation in larger, adequately powered multicentre trials.

Tuberculosis · Diagnostics · PLOS ONE

Clinical and laboratory determinants of treatment response and rifampicin resistance among Xpert MTB/RIF-confirmed extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients: A prospective study from Central India

PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0361115 · PubMed 42970549

What
A prospective observational study from R D Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, evaluating early clinical response to therapy and factors associated with rifampicin resistance among patients with Xpert MTB/RIF-confirmed extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in central India.
Design
Conducted at a tertiary care centre between 2018 and 2024. Baseline demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected; clinical response at 8 weeks was assessed using standardised criteria, and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with slow clinical response and rifampicin resistance.
Key findings
Of 5,764 presumptive EPTB samples tested by Xpert MTB/RIF, 532 patients had confirmed EPTB. Rifampicin resistance was detected in 36 patients (6.7%). Among 496 rifampicin-sensitive patients, 113 (22.8%) showed slow clinical response, independently associated with HIV co-infection, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, COPD, prolonged symptom duration, non-lymph node disease (particularly abdominal and genitourinary TB), rural residence, lower educational status and elevated ESR and CRP. Rifampicin resistance was associated with previous TB, HIV infection, male sex and disseminated disease, and was more frequent among slow responders than responders (12.3% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.002).
Limitations
Single tertiary centre; the abstract reports response at 8 weeks only and does not report final treatment outcomes.
Relevance to India
The authors state that the overlap between slow clinical response and drug resistance highlights the importance of early molecular diagnostics and targeted clinical monitoring in high-risk patients.

More from the journals

Antimicrobial resistance & stewardship

Tuberculosis & leprosy

Diagnostics

Virology & vaccines

Vector-borne & zoonoses

Mycology

Clinical infectious diseases & IPC

Items are summaries of published abstracts and are not clinical advice. Readers should consult the original article. Figures are quoted as reported in each abstract.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *